ABSTRACT
Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab-based regimen versus rituximab-based regimen in treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL).Methods:The Cochrane clinical controlled trials database, PubMed, Embase, American Society of Hematology meeting proceedings, American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting proceedings and ClinicalTrails database were searched for studies on the use of regimens containing obinutuzumab or rituximab for the treatment of B-NHL. Patients were divided into obinutuzumab group and rituximab group according to their medication status. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to compare the efficacy and safety of the two groups.Results:A total of 7 randomized controlled trials were selected, including 4 235 patients (1 430 cases of follicular lymphoma, 2 102 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and 703 cases of other B-NHL); 2 121 cases were in the obinutuzumab group and 2 114 cases were in the rituximab group. Among 4 162 patients who could be evaluated, the objective response rate (ORR) in the obinutuzumab group was higher than that in the rituximab group [75.1% (1 565/2 083) vs. 72.7% (1 512/2 079); OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41, P = 0.03]. Progression-free survival (PFS) in the obinutuzumab group was better than that in the rituximab group ( HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99, P = 0.03). Among 3 542 patients who could be evaluated for adverse reactions, the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse reactions in the otuzumab group was higher than that in the rituximab group [61.8% (1 098/ 1 776) vs. 54.2% (958/1 766); OR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.29-1.74, P < 0.001], the incidence of grade 3-4 infusive-related adverse reactions [7.5% (158/1 776) vs. 3.1% (65/1 766); OR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.91-3.45, P < 0.001] and neutropenia [34.1% (597/1 749) vs. 29.4% (511/1 738); OR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.47, P = 0.002] in the obinutuzumab group were higher than those in the rituximab group. Conclusions:The ORR and PFS of B-NHL patients treated with obinutuzumab-based regimen are better than those treated with rituximab-based regimen, but the influence of adverse reactions should be considered when selecting the regimen.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using Cyberknife in the treatment of patients with recurrent cholangiocellular carcinoma (RCC) after surgery.Methods Clinical data of 26 patients with recurrent RCC after surgery undergoing Cyberknife SBRT from 2010 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.The median recurrence time was 10 months (range 2.0-63.0 months) and the median tumor diameter was 2.8 cm (range 1.2-4.8 cm).The median prescription dose/fraction was 45 Gy/5f (range 40-50 Gy/3-8 f).The tumor progression was evaluated based on enhanced CT or MRI.Overall survival (OS),progression-free survival (PFS) and local control rate (LC) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method.Toxicity was assessed using the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0.Results For the entire cohort,the median OS and PFS were 13.5 months and 6.5 months at a median follow-up of 29.3 months (range 2.1-62.0 months).The 1-and 2-year OS and PFS rates were 52％ and 21％ as well as 28％ and 15％,respectively.Among them,4 patients (4/26,15％) were recurrent in situ after SBRT.Three patients experienced grade Ⅲ adverse reactions including 1 case of gastrointestinal reaction,1 case of liver dysfunction and 1 case of biliary tract infection.Only 1 patient suffered from ≥ grade Ⅳ gastrointestinal bleeding during the advanced stage.Conclusions SBRT using Cyberknife is a safe and effective treatment for patients with recurrent RCC after surgery.The adverse reactions can be tolerated by patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of hepatic hilar cancer.Methods A retrospective study was performed on the clinical data of 36 patients with hepatic hilar cancer who were admitted to our hospital and treated with CyberKnife SBRT from 2009 to 2015.In the 36 patients,37 lesions were found with tumor diameters ranging from 1.5 to 5.5 mm (median diameter 3 cm).The Synchrony respiratory tracking system was used for 21 lesions in 20 patients,while the XSight spinal tracking system was used for 16 lesions in 16 patients.Local progression was evaluated based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) rates,and the log-rank test was used for survival comparison and univariate prognostic analysis.Results The median follow-up time was 12.7 months.The 1-and 2-year postoperative LC rates were 90％ and 76％,respectively.The 1-year OS and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 63％ and 39％,respectively.The median OS and PFS times were 15.2 and 10 months,respectively.The incidence of grade 3 adverse reactions was 11％.Conclusions The CyberKnife SBRT is a safe and effective way to treat hepatic hilar cancer.